This is a far cry from the predominant view of historical writing that portrays entire populations as passive, unaffected subjects who are not having an impact on the debates and issues of their day.

Thompson was an Marxist historian, and considered it essential when he wrote this book to highlight the importance of the working class in history and the way in which the working class was constructed which is why he chose the title the book. Next story A sense of competitiveness should be encouraged for children. Thompson wanted to illustrate the complexities of history in action, not the previous works that attempted to minimize the role played by the working class. Band 8 essay for the IELTS. McNally argues: McNally states: Example Previous story You Discovered problems with the expensive item You bought | IELTS Band 8 Letter Example. "Thompson wanted to emphasize the work of everyday labouring people as an essential element in the development of history.

4 Responses. He hoped to highlight the inherent importance of the masses that create (and have created) history. "I am seeking," the writer wrote in a memorable section, to save the humble stocker and the Luddite cropper and that "obsolete" weaving handloom, the "utopian" craftsman as well as the fooled followers to Joanna Southcott, from the massive smugness of the past." There is a belief among some individuals that knowing about the history of our time is crucial and must be studied to better understand the current situation. The book was an instant classic because Thompson was determined to expose and reveal the conflicts and conflicts that resulted in the creation of history.

Some people believe that studying historical facts is not of any value and that it is not needed. This is a far cry from the predominant view of historical writing that portrays entire populations as passive, unaffected subjects who are not having an impact on the debates and issues of their day. I believe that the study of the past is crucial in understanding the development of mankind from very beginning until the present. The truth is not always in the past. Many of the issues we face today are resolved by looking back to their roots in the past.

The writing of history is always based on certain ideological and theoretical vantage perspectives. It is believed by certain individuals that history has no worth and doing research on it is a wasted time. An objective account about the history of capitalist development written by the perspective of a Marxist is vastly different from one written by an economist who is neoliberal. The reasoning behind this can be explained by a number of reasons.

Both would have adhered to a set of tenets prior to the time that dictated the methodological and theoretical approach to follow and, in turn, the exact questions that were asked. The first is that the modern world is changing rapidly and individuals feel obligated to stay abreast of the recent developments. Additionally, it’s important to recognize the reality may that the majority of historical narratives (stories) are in essence politicalin that they either affirm or challenge the beliefs, values and structures of the society. Therefore, it is difficult to find time to study the past. This means that the process of writing or (re)writing historical narratives inherently political.

In particular, most of people feel a great fascination with the latest gadgets and electronic devices since they increase level of comfort and quality of life. The recent interpretations and theories of the Holocaust have highlighted the problems that arise when writing and researching historical texts. With this in mind they tend to tend to take studying historical events for granted, as it’s outdated to devote time and effort in learning about the historical events of the past. In one instance David Irving was jailed for his famous refusal to acknowledge the Holocaust. In addition, the job opportunities that can be gained from studying history is limited and the majority of jobs do not pay enough.

In fact, it was revealed that he had ‘consistently and purposefully deceived and altered historical facts’ (Guardian 11th April, 2000) However, I think that learning about history is vital as it assists in understanding the how human civilization developed. E.P. The details regarding our ancestors’ history and challenges can help one study the evolution of the humans from prehistoric times to our present.

Thompson’s The Making of the English Working Class was clearly a political work in that Thompson wanted to reinstate the importance that the class struggle played in his understanding of the past. From the point of view of one nation, understanding history gives a clear understanding of the culture, heritage and the traditions. Thompson’s analysis was clearly influenced of Thompson’s Marxist background, since Thompson sought to challenge historical studies that emphasized and exalted the power of the elites of history. The era that spawned diverse religions and different languages, which is crucial to appreciate your faith and conviction. There is also a lot to learn by studying Howard Zinn, who in Peoples History of The United States described the battles among people of the Native Americans and the European Conquests and the struggle against slavery, and the struggles of feminists, trade unionists and Civil Rights movements. In addition, many issues of the contemporary times can be resolved by investigation of the underlying causes of their occurrence. The text has been widely utilized by US education and it is an excellent illustration of Critical Pedagogy, which Giroux describes as a. This is achievable through an exhaustive study of historic events. "… education movement, driven by principle and passion to assist students in developing awareness of freedom, identify the tendencies of authoritarians, and link information to power and the capacity to take actions." As an example, the issue of the population explosion in a few nations was caused by the large numbers of immigrants and refugees from other nations after an analysis of historical events.

A good illustration of non-mainstream historical scholarship can be found in the works of the French theorist Michel Foucault, who is the anti-historian of all time. As a conclusion, I believe that studying the past is vital to the survival of humanity. Foucault’s’histories’ contains alternative explanations of the creation of madness, sexuality, as well as crime and punishment. It assists in determining how to solve the issues in the present through understanding the history of events in the past.

In addition, these stories show how history may overlap and connect with other disciplines of the sciences of society (e.g. sociology) with positive results. It is the Concept and History of Cultural Heritage. The book, Discipline and Punishment, Foucault uses obscure sources from the past to offer a different view of the role of punishment and power in contemporary society.

The idea that is Cultural Heritage Cultural heritage can be defined as the accumulated legacy of physical objects (cultural heritage property) and intangible qualities of a community or society acquired in the distant past.


Комментарии (0)

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован.
Обязательные поля помечены *


  • Эстония
    : Is that really all there is to it because that'd be flaibergastbng.
  • Полезные советы новичкам WordPress
    : В строке с "else if" в примере (на картинке) вроде не хватает одной закрывающей кавычки. И
  • Gekos красно-золотой
    Админ Блогович
    : ИЛИ выступлениями на внешних семинарах/конференциях
  • Gekos в Стамбуле: мы работаем там, где лето
    : Очень крутая статья!
  • Как увернуться от гранаты или «Яндекс АГС – уберется все!»
    : Спасибо за кейс. На счёт хостингов - полностью согласен. Некоторые сайты расположены на ка